The applicant is applying for a default order in this matter. The applicant has instituted the proceedings against the first respondent, alleging that the first respondent name is confusingly similar to the applicant’s MAXI trade mark and the applicant’s name MAXI GROEPSKEMAS. The applicant is seeking an order that the first respondent be ordered to change its name to one which does not incorporate and is not confusingly and/or deceptively similar to the applicant’s trade mark MAXI
< Previous Duduzile Cynthia Myeni vs CIPC
CT002APRIL2014 Next >